You know how some things set a standard. They become the benchmark by which all others are judged. Well, for many of my reviews I have mentioned the CZ 100 pistol as an example of what I consider to have just about the worst trigger ever made on any production handgun. I’ve mentioned it, but until now, I have never introduced it to you. That’s been rather rude of me, so I apologize. Let me introduce it to you now.

The CZ 100 is a polymer framed automatic that is a radical departure from CZ’s standard 75 series based guns. It is not just a polymer framed CZ 75 clone. If that is what you are wanting, check out an IMI Desert Eagle poly in a 9, a .40 or a .45. I reviewed a pair of them last year. Those were outstanding handguns.

One of the biggest departures from normal CZ tradition is that the 100 is a double-action-only pistol. The trigger mechanism is unique in that the idea behind it is simple to the point of almost being brilliant. Pulling the trigger moves a hook that grabs a bar on the striker and slingshots it back. At the farthest point of travel, the trigger hook drops off of the striker, allowing it to fly forward to fire the gun.

I say “almost brilliant” because it (of course) fails miserably at being any sort of usable trigger at all. No, I’m serious. It’s bad. It’s the stuff that nightmares are made of. The trigger feels exactly like those old, toy guns you used to be able to buy at grocery stores that shoot those little plastic disks. I’ve actually had nightmares where a large, dark, looming threat is advancing on me and I pull out my sidearm and pull the trigger. It feels like that, and in my dream little plastic disks fly out to bounce off of the menace, which of course, is unfazed by the plastic disks. To put it bluntly, the CZ 100 is my nightmare pistol.

The trigger pull has a long take-up pull, then heavy stacking up to a level that is off of the scale. If just the trigger pull was bad, that would be one thing, but when the trigger breaks, it suddenly pulls the front sight off to the right. Trying as hard as I might, I could not pull the trigger without the sight being jerked off target. Interestingly, when I dry-fired the gun left-handed, the sights stayed on target. I don’t know why that is. Maybe it is the way that I manipulate triggers and I just do it differently left-handed. The trigger is not just bad; it’s so bad that it is funny. It’s almost as if it’s a joke. How could a serious arms company release a pistol so awful? Actually, several have. AMT’s back-up .45, the HK VP-70 and Stanley Staplers, all have bad triggers on the epic scale, but the CZ 100’s is worse. Trust me.

Now the question is this: Is the 100 otherwise a decent pistol that is handicapped with a bad trigger? Let’s take a look at it objectively. When you first pick up the 100, it feels pretty good in the hand. But the more you hold it, the more odd it feels. It gets to be downright awkward. The pistol’s styling is also interesting. They went to the trouble of making the gun as slick-sided as possible, including the breaking of the slide release lever and the take-down pin into two separate parts, instead of one combined unit. Then, they hide the slide release under the frame and have the release lever sticking out of an odd little window. It’s like a cross between something you might see on classic Star Trek and The Next Generation. The lines of the pistol are all wrong. Looking at it from a side view, it merely looks ugly. Change your viewing angle to look at it more from the front, and it becomes absolutely hideous. This is the Pontiac Aztec of handguns.

Like the Pontiac Aztec, even for being an abomination, it does offer good utility. For example, you can sometimes find a CZ 100 for under $300. It is very reliable. It has a unique belt/holster snag feature up on the top to help aid in one-hand slide manipulation. They needed this because you can’t quite hook your belt on the rear sights. (As a cruel joke, they topped this pistol with an adjustable rear sight, as if someone with a room temperature IQ might mistake it for a target pistol.) There is the hint of frame rails under the muzzle, tempting one to think of it as a tactical pistol. All of the tactical lights that I’ve tried on it don’t fit, and even if they did, they are not able to lock on to it. So it isn’t a tactical gun or a target gun. And being a 9mm, it is not an overly powerful gun. So what is it? I’m not exactly sure. I guess it is trying to be a self-defense gun. Let’s see if it is.

If you can manage rowing that trigger all the way back, the gun will fire every time until you have emptied all 12 rounds. Of course, you will feel like Ben Hur at the oars of a Roman galley by then, but the gun still works. That 12 round magazine is a decent payload for a gun so slim. The 100 is rather slick-sided for being so ugly, but then again, so is the Swamp Thing. All this can be yours, an easy packing, reliable, high capacity 9MM, for under $300. Like your mamma told you about lima beans, it doesn’t matter how bad it tastes; it’s good for you. I’ve actually seen examples for sale for as low as $225. At that price, you are at the Makarov level. I’m not sure which one I’d buy if they were side by side for the same price, but I’d probably lean to the Mak.

I don’t mean to bash the CZ 100 so completely, but I can’t help it. It is kind of like nachos. You can’t eat just one, unless by one you mean one plate full. One plate full is a good stopping point. Those who are familiar with me know that I am extremely fond of CZ firearms, so much so that one day, I hope to make a pilgrimage to the Czech Republic where CZ guns are made. My favorite handgun remains my CZ P-01. I especially like CZ’s magazine-fed, bolt action centerfire rifles. I find dang near everything else from CZ to be excellent and most worthy. I wouldn’t hesitate to spend my own cash on anything from CZ, except the 100. The 100 is just awful and should be avoided as much as possible, like it was the mosquito-borne West Nile Virus. That is unless you are a full blown CZ Freak and just have to have anything and everything from CZ. If that’s the case, I can’t blame you.

The 100 is a very interesting pistol. You can’t help but to look at it. It’s like a weird mole on the face of someone you are trying to talk to. There is some weird fascination about it that draws you to it. And that is the oddest thing about the CZ-100. For all of its warts, and for as ugly and utterly nasty as it is, you can’t help but to kind of like it, like ET in a way. Shooting the 100 well is a challenge, and therein is the attraction. It’s like riding a GP class bike with a tight clutch and a throttle like the trigger on a detonator…awkward and difficult. It’s fantastic. But it’s not something for everyone. If this article contradicts itself, it is a good metaphor for the pistol.

CZ USA could make this a much more appealing weapon system, but it would require a completely different firing system. I would suggest that they take a close, hard look at a couple of other good fire control systems. Kahr Arms has perhaps one of the best examples of a DAO (double-action-only) system. Then again, they could do it as a single-action system like the Springfield XD. That would be my choice if I was the head honcho at CZ. I’d also do something to the looks and the size. I would clip the grip frame down to “CZ Compact” size, and then re-contour the slide to something more appropriate for concealed carry. The weird way the slide overhangs the dust cover at the muzzle end reminds me of the front end (the bow, sorry) of an aircraft carrier. But considering that CZ’s line-up already has better pistols for these purposes, such as the P-01 and the PCR, there really is no need for the 100. There is no necessity for CZ to force out a polymer framed pistol before it is really ready for prime time. The only reason for using a plastic frame is to reduce weight. The only guns that need this are the ones that are intended specifically for concealment. And CZ has already done a poly version of the RAMI. I guess that the best thing for CZ to do would be to just drop the gun altogether.

Another thing about the 100 is that it has a brother. There is a .40 cal version that isn’t imported into the USA. It’s called it the CZ-110. If you think that the 100 is great, but just needs a little more horsepower, well, you’re wrong. The 110 is just as bad as the 100 ever was, but with snappier recoil added. Good times. Ugly and awkward, and now uncomfortable! Brilliant! To sum up the CZ 100 quickly, if you are a CZ collector, fine, then get it. If not, spend your money on a more worthy pistol.

Thanks to our friends at the United States Concealed Carry Association for this gun review.

Tags: CZKahr