image1-1038x576 BA

 

Stop it, snowflakes.

It should be no surprise that a student at Pitzer College, a private residential liberal arts college in Claremont, California, is crying ‘trigger warning’, but this kid is really reaching to find an issue here.

When a mural of a handgun with flowers coming out of the barrel was approved by the Pitzer College aesthetics committee and painted by student Selena Spier, Pitzer College Student Senator Gregory Ochiagha needed to draw himself a safe space.

Ochiagha sent an email to the entire student body to let everyone know how much the mural triggered him:

“It’s truly in bad taste to have a large depiction of a gun in a dorm space—especially when students of color also reside there. Now let’s imagine there were countless videos of white teenagers, white teenagers that look like you, or your brother or your sister, get shot to death by police officers. Imagine scrolling down Facebook everyday and seeing a new video of the same thing, over and over again. Really put yourself in that headspace. Then ask yourself whether it’s the brightest idea to have white teenagers, who have a very real fear of getting shot, see a large gun every time they want to get food from the dinning [sic] hall.

“My Black Mental and Emotional Health Matters. I shouldn’t be reminded every time I leave my dorm room of how easy my life can be taken away, or how many Black lives have been taken away because of police brutality. This is emotionally triggering for very obvious reasons. And if you want to belittle or invalidate by [sic] black experience, I live in Atherton, come thru, let’s have that idiotic conversation.”

The Claremont Independent reports:

Jessica Folsom (PZ ‘19) responded by providing additional background on the mural. “Just to preface this, I am not trying to dismiss how you feel or belittle your experience as a student of color,” she states. “This mural is actually representative of a nonviolence movement to protest the Vietnam War in the 60s. There’s a famous photo of a protester putting flowers in the barrel of a National Guardsman’s rifle and everything.” Folsom continues, “I thought it might be an important distinction to make between what the mural actually represents and perhaps the romanticized aesthetic of a gun which someone (maybe you?) could potentially mistake this for. I hope this helps.”

Not all students felt that Ochiagha’s reaction was warranted. “I actually love the mural and thought it was obvious that it was about the flower power movement/a message of anti-violence,” wrote Jennifer McNamara (PZ ‘19). “It was approved by the aesthetics committee and the artist has freedom of speech within her design. I’m excited to see it finished.”

Alessandra Elliott (PZ ‘18) added, “I love our radical liberalism. However, I’m not in love with the trend of shutting down voices that don’t align with liberal ideologies.”

Spier plans to modify her mural. “I spoke with Gregory earlier and we agreed on a modification that preserves the integrity of the original piece while avoiding any potentially triggering content—it’s a change I was absolutely happy to make in the interest of creating a safe and inclusive environment for everyone in my community,” Spier told the Claremont Independent. “I have absolutely no right to decide whether or not my artwork is offensive to marginalized communities—nor does anyone else in a position of privilege, racial or otherwise.”

This kid needs a timeout and a not-so-gentle reminder that the world does not revolve around you.