“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” Margaret Mead

A group of Longmeadow, MA residents rallied citizens to successfully defeat three proposals for increased gun control aimed at adding restrictions on both gun owners and businesses.

While all three measures were rejected by a majority vote, Henry Lanouette, Communications Director for Longmeadow Citizens for Liberty, says citizens across America can have the same effect in their community.

Lanouette and Walt Lamon founded the group which grew to a committee of about 31 and now has a membership of about 125. The group worked tirelessly in the weeks leading up to the vote, talking to local media, reaching out to friends and neighbors, putting up yard signs, even handing out informational pamphlets before Tuesday’s town hall and vote.

“We had out-of-town 2nd Amendment supporters who couldn’t vote but wanted to help, so they came to the town hall to hand out pamphlets,” said Lanouette. “They even showed up the week before to stand with us on the road sides to hold VOTE NO signs or an American flag. Of course, this got us branded as ‘stealthy’ because our signs said ‘VOTE NO’ and listed the three article numbers, not the 3 or 4 paragraphs of proposed regulation.”

Residents first voted to reject Article 29, which was a bylaw that would impose fines for anyone who carried a firearm on town property.

They also voted to reject Article 30, a bylaw that would have forced gun owners to describe, in writing, each gun they own when they renew their gun license or apply for an FID card.

The other proposed article rejected, Article 31, was meant to ban assault rifles in town, and would have imposed a $300 fine for each day the gun is in town.

Some feared the bylaws took away their Second Amendment rights, while others thought the proposals would improve public safety.

Norman Spencer, who opposes gun restriction, told 22News, “A lot of this gives that away, and gives us nothing. No protection, nothing.”

Bunny Bewick, who wants tighter gun laws, said, “I am anti-weapons of mass destruction. I think that because of safety, certainly, and maybe a little moral issue in there somewhere.”

In an exclusive interview, Lanouette told Bearing Arms, “It’s been said that the NRA was inserting itself into local town politics and our group was a puppet for NRA. While we are NRA members and life members at that, we acted as concerned citizens and we got this defeated. We reached out to our community members and worked to encourage local citizens to rise up and they crushed this attack.”

“We each put our own cash in to fund this defense to the attack on our guaranteed freedom. The NRA did not fund us or our efforts, nor did they send representatives. We applaud the citizens of Longmeadow for having the common sense to vote down these expensive, onerous proposed local laws, which would duplicate state laws and create a burden on the local police department and the local gun owners who have committed no crimes. Our community is peaceful and quiet, which might fluff the pillows of all those in our town that think violence and crime cannot enter their world. They view THINGS (guns) as evil and overlook the fact that some PEOPLE are evil.”

While some immediately spoke out against the vote, leave it to an elite member of academia to attack a group of citizens holding the American flag and speaking out against unconstitutional laws. A poli-sci professor from Connecticut took to a MASS Public TV blog in response to their efforts by calling the group “jingoistic patriots”.

Lanouette clarified, “We prefer… just patriots.”

Well done, Longmeadow patriots!
Are you paying attention, America? You can rally your community into action, too. Use this example from LongForLiberty to inspire a 2A grassroots to take hold in your area and let’s show our elected officials just what the power of we the people can truly accomplish!
Screen Shot 2016-05-11 at 3.19.45 PM
 Screen Shot 2016-05-11 at 3.19.45 PM