Shannon Watts, Founder of Moms Demand Action and inspiration for the #ImBlockedByShannonWatts club, is burning up her keyboard for Hillary Clinton and continuing to respond to the NRA, despite the fact she herself has admitted they’ve blocked her. (which is against Twitter’s community standards)

Watts is lighting up Twitter with her praise for how a Hillary presidency will push gun control and take down the NRA:

.@HillaryClinton is 1st presidential candidate to make #gunsense part of policy platform. It takes a woman to take on the @NRA. #WhySheRuns pic.twitter.com/jqrGjW8U6T

— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) October 27, 2016

Translation: Hillary is the first Presidential candidate who has outright said she will work to take away our Second Amendment rights.

Justice Clarence Thomas on Second Amendment: Some "want to pretend it doesn't exist" https://t.co/IKF8qZAc4R #2A

— NRA (@NRA) October 27, 2016

Oh we know it exists – the @NRA wants to pretend it can't be regulated. Justice Clarence Thomas #2A https://t.co/GgaMHmlsIm

— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) October 27, 2016

No one ever said guns can’t be regulated.

The stakes are clear. If @HillaryClinton wins, freedom loses. If the Senate falls, freedom loses. https://t.co/U13ruXqKor #2A

— NRA (@NRA) October 26, 2016

Daily reminder that the @NRA defines freedom as being vulnerable to gun violence in schools, workplaces, places of worship, nightclubs… https://t.co/QONR9wq3nq

— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) October 27, 2016

Actually, the NRA defines freedom as being able to exercise our God-given right to self defense protected by the Second Amendment in places where people are most vulnerable to gun violence. The fact is, all but two of the mass shootings in America have taken place in gun free zones.

Shannon Watts’ version of freedom: making people victims by disarming them and making them defenseless against the evil that always finds a way in this world.

Who’s logic are you more inclined to follow, Shannon Watts or Chris Bird?

In the same way that in the military, “friendly fire” isn’t, “gun free zones” aren’t. They are only free of law-abiding citizens with #guns. pic.twitter.com/NyQjMA9KK0

— Chris Bird (@HandgunChris) October 27, 2016