Taking steps to reduce gun violence worth doing if it could save one life. But it could save far more. Finish this. https://t.co/P7LuMWrQ6B
— Vice President Biden (@VP) June 17, 2016
Democrat Vice President Joe Biden has stopped creeping on other men’s wives long enough to back an attempt to ban the most popular and best-selling rifle in the United States. Biden posted the following response to a petition calling for the repeal of the AR-15, a modular, open-source rifle platform supported by hundreds of companies and enjoyed by millions of Americans of every race, sexual orientation, age, and color.
Biden’s staff wrote for him:
Over the past few years, we’ve watched as new horrific shootings have replaced previous ones as the deadliest in our nation’s history.
We’ve waged campaign after campaign to turn our grief into action — each time thinking maybe, just maybe, this will be the one that breaks through. This will be the one that gets through to Congress, which must ultimately act. We’ve used phrases like Now is the Time. Stop Gun Violence. Enough is Enough.
Folks, enough has been enough for a long time.
You know that. On Monday, in the wake of this latest, deadliest, mass shooting, you started this petition. You worked together, calling on your government to ban AR-15-type weapons from civilian ownership. In the days following, we have seen members of the United States Senate take and hold the floor, refusing to back down, refusing to concede that we might need to wait for an even bigger national tragedy to finally make some changes.
To the creator and signers of this petition, I want to say this as plainly and clearly as possible: The President and I agree with you. Assault weapons and high-capacity magazines should be banned from civilian ownership.
When a lone gunman walked into a Century movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, he carried a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 — a variation of the AR-15 rifle — modified to hold as many as 100 bullets. He used it to kill 12 people and injure 70.
And when a lone gunman walked into a classroom at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon, he carried a version of the AR-15. He used it — and several handguns — to kill 10 of his fellow students and injure nine.
And when a lone gunman walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, he carried a Bushmaster XM 15 — another version of the AR-15 — and multiple high-capacity magazines. He used it to kill 20 innocent children and six educators with 154 bullets in five minutes.
A single person killed that many people in just a few minutes. Not in a war zone. Here in America — in a classroom.
These weapons have been used to commit horrific acts. They’ve been called “the perfect killing machines.” They fire bullets at incredible speed that rip through bodies and cause devastating carnage, and can accommodate high-capacity magazines that allow them to effectively shoot up to 45 rounds per minute. We’ve seen their tragic results play out in our death tolls and in the thousands left wounded, struggling to recover.
As we learned this week from the family of the gun’s inventor, he himself did not intend that this gun be used by civilians, only by our soldiers in combat — giving them an advantage over the AK-47. He didn’t own one himself. Here is what his family said:
“We think he would have been horrified and sickened as anyone, if not more, by these events.”
Right now, these weapons are on the shelves in gun shops around the country, completely legal for civilians to purchase. They can be purchased in a matter of mere minutes. That should not be so.
Here’s a start: We should renew the assault weapons ban that Congress passed in 1994 — but which expired ten years later. That ban, which covered 19 specific assault-style weapons, was included in a comprehensive crime bill that folded together three pieces of legislation. I remember it well. I was Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time. I wrote much of the bill and led it through Congress — with the help of many others, especially Senator Feinstein on the assault weapons ban. I argued strongly in favor of banning these weapons. What’s more, 46 House Republicans voted for that ban in 1994. Forty-six.
So what happened to that bill? To use a somewhat wonkish legislative term, it was “sunsetted.” That means that this bill came with an expiration date: Ten years after its passage, it would need to be renewed. Under President Bush and a Republican Congress, the bill lapsed. And it hasn’t been renewed since.
But renewing the ban on assault weapons isn’t the only thing Congress should do to help prevent the tragedy of gun violence around the country.
It could require that every buyer go through a background check before getting a gun — to make sure dangerous weapons don’t end up in the hands of criminals or other people who have long been prohibited from possessing them. It could prevent people who are suspected of having terrorist ties and can’t get on a plane from buying weapons of war — that’s just common sense. It could ensure that domestic abusers can’t go to the store to buy a gun — filling the kinds of gaps in the law that leave too many innocent victims dead. It could end the freeze on gun violence research, so our public health experts can collect data and facts that would inform strategies to deal with this epidemic. And it could give law enforcement officials the tools and resources the President requested in his budget proposal — so they can take dangerous criminals off the street and enforce our gun laws. Our Administration has done what it can. So have many cities, counties, and states.
Now it’s up to Congress to do its job.
They’ll have a good opportunity this Monday, when the Senate is set to vote on a number of different gun safety measures — votes that came about after that 15-hour filibuster, during which a series of Democratic senators refused to cede the floor. The measures they will vote on would address the fact that anyone on a terrorist watch list can still legally purchase guns and explosives. They will address the current background check requirements for prospective gun buyers.
Ahead of those votes, we’d like to invite you to join a call at 1pm EST for We the People signers with Valerie Jarrett on how we can continue to come together as citizens around this issue. Let us know you’ll be joining right here — and ask any questions you’ve got, or issues you’d like to hear raised on the call.
I encourage you to pay attention to Monday’s votes. Make yourselves aware. Use your voice. Make yourselves impossible to ignore.
Because you’re not alone in recognizing the need to act — to take steps, consistent with the Second Amendment — that will keep our children and communities safe. Here’s who else agrees with you: The Department of Justice. Dozens of United States Senators. Faith leaders, law enforcement officials, and responsible businesses. Public health experts. And the vast majority of the American people, including the vast majority of gun owners in the country.
If taking commonsense steps to reduce gun violence had the potential to save even one life, it would be worth doing. But it has the potential to save far more than that.
You know that. And that is why you spoke up. That matters. But the fact is that we have three separate but equal branches of a government for a reason.
And so, to speak directly to those members of Congress who, in the wake of this most recent, most horrific killing of our citizens, might be considering stepping up and getting this done once and for all, I’d like to remind you that this will not stop on its own. It will not stop. In the three and a half years since Newtown, there have been at least 1,002 mass shootings in this country. At least 1,135 people killed, and 3,953 wounded. That includes 49 killed and 53 wounded in Orlando.
You know in your heart that this is the right thing to do. You know that by stepping up, your action has the potential to create a domino effect. Have the courage to do it.
We have done it before. We can do it again.
Vice President Joseph Biden
The White House
There are an estimated 9 million AR-15 rifles in the United States.
These nine million rifles are popular with younger shooters and women because the intermediate power cartridge—on the low end of the rifle power scale—means that the gun doesn’t have much recoil or “kick,” and can be fired comfortably. People with disabilities also favor the AR-15, finding that the rifle’s aftermarket support to allow them to modify it to their needs.
Target shooters enjoy it’s accuracy and quality trigger options. There are many kinds of shooting competitions involving AR-15s, including face-paced three-gun matches and the long-range precision matches of the government-supported Civilian Marksmanship Program.
Hunters enjoy more than 30 different caliber options to choose from, enabling AR-15-equipped hunters swap out just a few key parts to tackle everything from prairie dogs at long range in Montana to feral hogs in the swamps of Georgia to moose in Maine and deer in the Carolinas.
Among firearms experts the AR-15 is touted as among the very best choices for home defense, as it is easier to shoot with more precision accuracy under stress than a handgun, gets back on target faster due to low recoil, and with good ammo selection, poses less of a risk of overpenetration and a threat to innocent bystanders than many common pistol and shotguns.
Our military veterans prefer them, because the AR-15 sporting rifles that have been on the civilian market since 1963 remind them of the fully-automatic M16 that become America’s standard issue military rifle 6 years later. Our first responders in law enforcement have adopted them as patrol rifles, as AR-15s allow surgically-precise shots to save lives.
AR-15s have been part of the American way of life for more than a half-century. They are based on a self-loading mechanism 130 years old. They aren’t a threat to the American way of life. In fact, more than any other arm, they preserve and defend it.
I wish I could say the same for Vice President Biden and President Obama, as they and their Democrat allies attempt to exploit an Islamic terrorist attack carried out by a long-time Democrat voter with a rifle which, by the way, wasn’t an AR-15.
In response to an attack carried out by an ISIS-aligned Islamic terrorist for bombing raids Barack Obama ordered in Syria, Democrats are pushing bills attacking the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments, and maybe more.
We will not be giving up our AR-15s, our standard capacity magazines, or our liberty. Joe.
You and your fellow liberty-hating progressive Democrats can go pound sand.