Yesterday, a whole pile of kids got up and walked out of school. Why?
It seems there were a lot of mixed signals floating around. For some, it was about remembering the Parkland students and teachers killed a month ago. For others, it was about squashing our Second Amendment rights. And that’s the problem.
For example, NRA TV’s Cam Edwards reports varying descriptions of what his own children were told.
My middle schooler daughter said their walkout was a memorial for the students in Parkland.
My high schooler son said his teacher directed his class outside, where the principal invoked his youth in the 60's and talked about the power of protest to change laws. https://t.co/A5n4DbafMc
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) March 15, 2018
The tweet he was responding to was regarding a story at The Federalist where it seems a number of parents were being told the walkout for gun control was really a memorial for those killed at Parkland.
My local television station also reported it as a memorial for the Parkland slain.
The purpose of the event is to remember the lives lost in the Parkland shooting and also a call to action for gun violence in schools.
Yet note the sign in the back. It makes no mention of Parkland, only gun control. If it’s about remembering the kids killed, then wouldn’t thrusting politics into the moment be in poor taste?
It’s not alone, either.
I could go on and on, but I won’t. You get the point. At least a large number of students argue it was about gun control, while some were saying it was remembering the dead.
And that’s part of the problem regarding the walkout yesterday. Without a unified message, it’s impossible to tell what any of it was about. It’s ridiculous to lump those who walked out in memory of the dead with those who walked out in support of gun control. After all, anyone should be able to recognize that even supporters of the Second Amendment might be drawn to stand up and honor those killed.
Yet that’s not what’s taking place. What’s happening is people are looking at the walkout as some grand success, a real blow against the gun rights community.
But it’s not.
When some students are forced to “walk out,” and others are told it’s for something completely different, then the numbers become even more meaningless.
Not to mention, students walking out in the first place–particularly with the administration’s permission–is attractive to kids who just don’t want to stay in class. The number of students walking out will be artificially inflated by those who see it as a handy excuse to skip class.
Others may feel obligated to walk out through peer pressure. They don’t want to be the only one sitting in class when everyone else gets up. Couple that with students who think it’s for something completely different, and you have a movement that is meaningless.
Don’t get me wrong, I support their right to protest. I don’t think a walkout is a good way to do it, and I think schools are justified to punish them for the disruption, but protesting itself? More power to them – even if I disagree with what they’re saying.Their First Amendment rights aren’t subject to my whims, nor should they be.
But let’s not blow Wednesday’s walkout out of proportion. In fact, we shouldn’t make anything out of the walkout. Without a unified message, all we have are a gaggle of kids walking out of class.
I forget where I saw it, but someone suggested that if you want to see the real number of gun control supporters in a school, hold a teach-in on Saturday at the school. I agree. That would be telling.
Somehow, I think the teach-in would be awfully empty.