The National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) was created in a very different world that the one we’re living in now, and many parts of the NFA—such as restrictions and interpretations regarding the differences between “pistols” and “short-barrelled rifles”—are now clearly utterly absurd.
Can we agree that the arbitrary short-barreled rifle and suppressors provisions of the National Firearms Act are simply obsolete, and the law needs to be heavily revised?
Author's Bio:
Bob Owens
Bob Owens is the Editor of BearingArms.com.
Bob is a graduate of roughly 400 hours of professional firearms training classes, including square range and force-on force work with handguns and carbines. He is a past volunteer instructor with Project Appleseed. He most recently received his Vehicle Close Quarters Combat Instructor certification from Centrifuge Training, and is the author of the short e-book, So You Want to Own a Gun.
He can be found on Twitter at bob_owens.
