Adamiak Writes Letter to New ATF Director Asking for Clarity

AP Photo/Keith Srakocic

Patrick "Tate" Adamiak is rotting in a prison cell he never should have seen the inside of. He was charged with multiple weapons violations, and in every case, the charge is bogus. This isn't a case of there being nuance that, as a Second Amendment advocate, I'm inclined to view differently than prosecutors. This was a case of a young man being charged for violating laws that he simply did not violate.

Advertisement

And the fact that he's still in prison after all we know is one of the greatest injustices I know of.

The ATF did everything wrong in order to get this conviction, and now they have a new director who doesn't seem to hate gun rights, something that seems strange in the only federal law enforcement agency that exists expressly to, in part, restrict an enumerated right listed in the Constitution.

Adamiak has written a letter to the new ATF director, which Lee Williams published on his Substack. In it, he asks for, among other things, a little clarity.


May 8, 2026

If I could speak directly to ATF Director Robert Cekada, I would begin by acknowledging that what happened in my case occurred prior to his leadership at the ATF, under then-Director Steven Dettelbach. I recognize that distinction. I also recognize the tone he and Attorney General Todd Blanche have recently set, and it is one that gives me reason to write this.

If I could ask for one thing, it would be this: clear lines, consistently enforced. No American should have to guess where legality ends and a felony begins, especially when the consequence can mean decades of imprisonment and the permanent loss of constitutional rights.

The ATF holds extraordinary authority over how complex, technical firearms laws are interpreted. That authority demands not only expertise, but restraint and consistency. What I experienced reflected neither.

On April 11, 2022, four days after my arrest, President Joe Biden stood beside Director Dettelbach and acknowledged pushing for new rules because legislation could not be passed through Congress. Weeks earlier, the Department of Justice had already initiated an enforcement surge targeting privately made firearms, allocating additional prosecutorial resources and intensifying focus.

That context matters because my case aligned with that moment.

I was charged based on items the ATF classified as “firearm receivers,” items that had freely circulated in open commerce for decades. I was arrested before the rule redefining those items was publicly announced. That is not clarity. It is enforcement applied ahead of definition.

So, I continue to ask: how does something that did not meet the legal definition of a receiver at the time become the foundation for a federal prosecution? How does a collection of parts become a narrative carrying decades of exposure?

Advertisement

There's a whole lot more, and Adamiak makes a lot of excellent points in his letter, including how the ATF modified evidence despite that going against agency policy, then used the results of those modifications to make the case that Adamiak possessed illegal goods. He was prosecuted for things that were perfectly legal when arrested, but were made illegal by the time he sat in a courtroom.

As it is, much of what the ATF does is unclear to the average consumer. While I understand the concept of "ignorance of the law is no defense," the reality is that someone can't know what is acceptable and what isn't, how is anyone supposed to act lawfully?

Adamiak bought all firearms via standard transfers. He filled out a Form 4473 and complied with the law, but then he was prosecuted for illegal machine guns because someone decided they were machine guns, even though the ATF's own published policy says otherwise. He was charged with possession of destructive devices that were no such thing, all based on one agent's inane testimony and a lack of clarity about so much more.

Tate Adamiak shouldn't be in prison. He never should have been in a courtroom.

What happened was that he ended up in agents' sights, and rather than admit they'd wasted their time, the ATF decided to trip over itself to manufacture a case that didn't exist.

And that needs to be corrected. Immediately.

Editor’s Note: The radical Left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.

Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Sponsored